36 research outputs found

    "Developers are Responsible": What Ad Networks Tell Developers About Privacy

    Get PDF

    Embedding Privacy Into Design Through Software Developers: Challenges & Solutions

    Get PDF
    To make privacy a first-class citizen in software, we argue for equipping developers with usable tools, as well as providing support from organizations, educators, and regulators. We discuss the challenges with the successful integration of privacy features and propose solutions for stakeholders to help developers perform privacy-related tasks.Comment: To be published in "IEEE Security & Privacy: Special Issue on Usable Security for Security Workers" 11 pages, 4 figure

    Better Call Saltzer \& Schroeder: A Retrospective Security Analysis of SolarWinds \& Log4j

    Full text link
    Saltzer \& Schroeder's principles aim to bring security to the design of computer systems. We investigate SolarWinds Orion update and Log4j to unpack the intersections where observance of these principles could have mitigated the embedded vulnerabilities. The common principles that were not observed include \emph{fail safe defaults}, \emph{economy of mechanism}, \emph{complete mediation} and \emph{least privilege}. Then we explore the literature on secure software development interventions for developers to identify usable analysis tools and frameworks that can contribute towards improved observance of these principles. We focus on a system wide view of access of codes, checking access paths and aiding application developers with safe libraries along with an appropriate security task list for functionalities

    “I Don’t Know Too Much About It”: On the Security Mindsets of Computer Science Students

    Get PDF
    The security attitudes and approaches of software developers have a large impact on the software they produce, yet we know very little about how and when these views are constructed. This paper investigates the security and privacy (S&P) perceptions, experiences, and practices of current Computer Science students at the graduate and undergraduate level using semi-structured interviews. We find that the attitudes of students already match many of those that have been observed in professional level developers. Students have a range of hacker and attack mindsets, lack of experience with security APIs, a mixed view of who is in charge of S&P in the software life cycle, and a tendency to trust other peoples' code as a convenient approach to rapidly build software. We discuss the impact of our results on both curriculum development and support for professional developers
    corecore